This year's choreography Tony is certainly one of the most interesting contests in years. I am leaning towards Blankenbuehler - the movement in Hamilton is integral to its success and is really co-direction of the entire show. Glover's work is always glorious and deserving too. I suspect this category is going to be the closest (it would be great if it were a tie!) Wondering what others think? (sorry, Hofesh Schefter, Randy Skinner and Sergio Trujillo have to be happy with their nominations, since they won't win)...
I really think this one will go to Savion, as Shuffle Along features such blazing, blistering real dance...Blankenbuehler's work in Hamilton is breath-taking, terrifically cinematic, but I agree with previous poster who said it's hard to know what is Blankenbuehler's "choreography" and what is Kail's staging...whatever it was, it resulted in a seamless partnership that helps make Hamilton flow like few shows ever have... Still, based on pure dance, I think it will go to Savion...
neonlightsxo said: "Could go either way, honestly. People might want to recognize Savion as the win for the show, or they might vote straight down the ticket for Ham."
Let's hope they take the time and thought to not do the latter.
I'm curious who people think deserves it in addition to who will get it. They both did exceptional work, but personally, I'd lean towards Glover for personal choice but think that Blankenbuehler will get it--it's very, very strong work in the most beloved show. For Hamilton to lose a category, I think it would take exceptional work that also feels much showier than what Hamilton is offering. For me, that makes them most vulnerable in Leading Actress where Soo could be considered a featured performer and there are phenomenal actresses with much larger roles (Erivo and Mueller in particular) or Set Design where She Loves Me has a fantastic set that is also much more detailed than Hamilton's (I'm not say more detail or flash is better--just that it might be what it takes to eke out a win).
This is totally off topic but since the discussion started - the Hamilton turntables would be scenic design, no? They might help pull out a win there.
Right, turntables are part of scenic design, but Blankenbuehler and Kail's use of them is choreography and staging - again, hard to know which is which.
And I agree with you, the dancing in Fiddler is wonderful, but it feels like we've seen most of that before and before and before...
TNick926 said "And I agree with you, the dancing in Fiddler is wonderful, but it feels like we've seen most of that before and before and before..."
Interesting - I came here to say the exact opposite! I thought the choreo in Fiddler was the coolest part of the show - the way he merged traditional Eastern European Fiddler choreography with modern dance really fascinated me.
Either way, I agree that the race is between Blankenbueller and Glover. I'm 100% Team Glover.
For me, I am just not a big fan of Andy B's choreography in anything he has done...so while I get he is an intricate part of Hamilton, I would also pick Savion.
I HATED the Ham choreography the first time i saw it. The second time I liked it- then it stuck with me over the months, and now, when i see clips, I really love it. Its different, new, unusual, and great. Like all great things, it doesn't necessarily connect with audiences right away- kind of like Stravinsky's Rite of Spring
Savion Glover has been producing astonishing dance work on Broadway for 30 years if you go back to Tap Dance Kid. His work for SHUFFLE ALONG tops everything that came before, and will be studied for decades to come as the sui generis of brilliant tap shows. The Tony should be his.
It would be disturbing if Glover didn't win the Tony for his work in Shuffle Along. The tap is the star of this show and he choreographed complicated numbers with a ton of people tapping on stage (of course much credit to those executing it).
I have not seen Hamilton. I have seen Shuffle Along. My thought is that I need to see HAMILTON to appreciate the choreography because what I saw of the 16 minute best of/montage cilip seemed to be repetitive. However it seems that the choreography and direction merged in this production. For pure choreography I have to go with Savion. That Pennsylvania piece alone deserves a Tony. I have never been that jaw dropped over a piece as I was the evening I saw the show. Flat out stunning. JMO
Regardless of the "which is which" argument, I'm Team Savion. Incredible work and, frankly, I think much of the choreography in "Hamilton" is kinda dumb. I look forward to (far in the future) stripped-down versions of the show.
It was when I noticed the motifs in choreography during Hamilton's monologue in "The World Was Wide Enough" last time I went to Hamilton that I noticed how brilliant Blankenbuehler's work is (consider watching the ensemble members alone during that minute and a half if you have tickets to an upcoming performance—you'll no doubt cry like I did). Glover's choreography is the finest of its craft, but in my opinion, Blankenbuehler's is as well—and his goes above and beyond in making the movement of the show both emblematic of the time period as well as, in a way, a character itself. Count me in Team Blankenbuehler (which isn't, by any means, saying that Glover's work isn't ingenious as well).