kdogg36 said: "dadaguza said: "Yes, it is. Why is OK for you and Jay Lerner to spout derogatory things about religion and religious beliefs, calling them ridiculous,but that comment I made triggers you and now I'm a troll?"
I know I'm going to regret throwing good time after bad, but here are three responses:
(1) This thread is a very specific corner of a corner of the internet where criticism of religious belief was explicitly solicited, so I felt I could say what's on my mind about the topic (and I'll point out again thatIemphasized my own intellectual limitations). You, on the other hand, choose to post on a thread that you knew wasn't really intended for you (okay, free country), about something that had nothing to do with the original topic.
Why is this thread not "intended for me"? Was I supposed to engage in the mockery of religious people instead of calling certain posters out? I don't post as much as others but I frequent these boards alot, including this off topic one. And there are multiple threads in here knocking, criticizing, or people just saying they "don't get why" certain traditional lifestyles or practices have not yet been abolished. (ie. the heterosexual weddings thread) Some subject lines are almost blatant rage bait.
Comments you guys made in this thread, like people who pray must have a mental illness, or live in a fantasy land, are exact comments people have made about the transgender community, that's why I thought of it and used it as an example when I said respect should be reciprocated. Why is it understandable for one group of people to be offended by those comments, but another should just tolerate it? You were callously making comments as if no one reading them would or should get offended, but my male breast feeding comment was so out of line and offensive and triggering that it means I'm a troll. It just feels hypocritical to me, that's why I engaged in this thread. And although I do believe in a God I'm not even super religious!
"(2) Religion is entirely a chosen, changeableproperty of an individual (as a former Catholic I know this as intimately as anyone could possibly know anything), and therefore a legitimate basis for judgment. Gender identity is not."
And there are people who believe that is the result of a mental illness. Just like you believe praying is due to a mental illness. Why is it OK to say that about one individual but not another, whether it's the result of a changeable property or not?
"(3) If you really believed in the principle of "reciprocal respect" that you previously espoused, you'd behave according to that principle regardless of what I choose to do. Me, I believe in "judge and prepare to be judged." And I sure am judging you right now."
That's cool :) You are just an anonymous person on a message board.