joevitus said: "ChrisTyler1288 said: "I'd be curious to get my hands on a copy of the musical's script and see what and all could be done with it to make it palatable to today's audience. The score has a LOT of great songs that when done WELL, can bring down the house."
Having seen the show, and having owned the script, I honestly don'tget what people are talking about in terms of it not being "palatable." That men sing about liking to have sex with women? That some men pay for sex from professionals? In an era where sex workers are more respected than ever, yet also the age of Trump's corrupt administration and Fox News phoney kissing up to "traditionalvalules," it may work better now than ever.
The only thing I wonder about is Shy, the young girl who comes to the house with Angel, and Mona almost turns away as a worker until she realizes that Shy was sexually abused by her father and has run away without anywhere to go. It isn't played for laughs at all, and itleads into a great song, "Girl, You're a Woman." I wonder if today that would seem "inappropriate" in a musical comedy, or if audiences would applaud Masterson and King for looking a fairly serious subject straight in the eye.
A good revival would be very welcome."
I'm also a little confused about what would be "problematic" about the show as-is. It's decidedly very much a sympathetic and humanizing portrayal of sex workers without most of the typical "women in danger" tropes around it (these women are certainly pretty empowered, particularly for a show set fifty years ago or so!), while also a skewering of conservative moral hypocrisy and media sensationalism.
And unlike the movie, the stage show is much more of an ensemble piece instead of than the Mona Show.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
Updated On: 9/1/26 at 05:44 PM