Fred Mason said: "The landlords usually take a percentage of the box office, so they have skin in the game too. It’s not like a set amount taking over the operating costs. They’re certainly not the main problem, I’d blame unions before the landlords. Producers go to unions for exceptions for smaller projects, and they tell them, i need this exception or else I won’t be able to hire anyone. Rather than working with them, the unions literally don’t care and would rather none of their members get work. Disgraceful."
The problem here is simple. If you give one producer a break, why not all of them? Who do you choose to lower your wages for? And once you do that, every show that has the slightest bit of struggles will want you to lower your wages. That being said, you seem to not really know how many times the unions are asked to waive something during a run and how often we acquiesce. You just can't do it on a grand scale or what I described becomes the norm.
Do you really think it's fair for ALW, a billionaire, to ask working people to take less? I'm not sure I understand that.
You do realize if a billionaire puts their money in a no risk, guaranteed 4% earning bond, they make almost $800,000 a week? But, yea, let's ask the unions for givebacks.