News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
pixeltracker

People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?- Page 2

People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?

Dollypop
#25People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/6/20 at 8:16pm

Lordy me, how did I forget BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY's with Mary Tyler Moore and Richard Chamberlain? Edward Albee's book was exceptionally talky and leaden and it's true, the audience did talk back to the actors. At one point Moore's character asked the rhetorical question, "What am I to do?" and a male voice from the audience answered, "Go home so we can, too!"


"Long live God!" (GODSPELL)

Jarethan
#26People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/6/20 at 8:56pm

MCW1227 said: "I saw the original cast of Evita and while even as a theater newbie at the time, I recognized the stellar performances and the crowds excitement. However, I didn’t enjoy the production overall ( I know, horror!) but I can’t remember why I didn’t enjoy it only that I didn’t and especiallywhen comparing it to the two iconic productions I saw before this, Chicago (Gwen and Chita) and Annie (original cast)."

I do not think that the wildly successful original Broadway premiere production of Evita, which won an armful of Tony's, qualifies as living in infamy.  I would say that the original production is a musical theatre classic.

GavestonPS Profile Photo
GavestonPS
#27People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/6/20 at 10:26pm

I'm not sure how we are defining "infamy" here. It's a strong word.

I ended up howling with laughter at the first preview of MERRILY; it was such a mess! I saw the last preview and thought, "Well, it still doesn't work, but they have cleaned it up as much as they can."

I thought some of the more broadly farcical scenes in MOOSE MURDERS were really quite good. Unfortunately, the leading lady (Holland Taylor had replaced Eve Arden) had a dry delivery that completely clashed with broadness of the better scenes. (Both Taylor and Arden are/were brilliant comediennes, of course; the fault was in the show and direction, not in the acting.)

I was shocked to find A DOLL'S LIFE just as bad on the stage as it had been on the page before the company left for tryouts in California. To this day, I have no idea what Prince was thinking. I'm not sure he knew either, since I worked some of the auditions and he seemed entirely unsure what he wanted from the cast. But starting a musical comedy with the final scene from Ibsen's play was such a clash of styles, I was scratching my head along with the rest of the audience. Only I knew what to expect, so I wasn't laughing at tragedy.

On the other hand, I loved every minute of PASSION, though I know nobody else who agrees. I found its refusal to pander to "likability" entirely thrilling--and I fell in love with it all over again at a production in Pasadena in January, a run that was sadly cut short by the pandemic. It's akin to watching Grotowski--nobody cares whether you "like" the characters or the story; it isn't even an issue. One interesting change in Pasadena: they made no effort to make Fosca ugly with make-up. When she first entered, I thought "She's too pretty to play the part," but I quickly found her neurosis and neediness just as unappealing as Donna Murphy's unibrow. But in a curious way, it made Fosca more of an agent in her own story; she wasn't just a victim of nature.

Note to Jarethan: I too was uninspired by EVITA in previews. Then I saw it a few weeks later in London and loved it. The slightly broader musical-theater acting by English actors in those days made more sense of the material to me.

Updated On: 5/6/20 at 10:26 PM

imeldasturn Profile Photo
imeldasturn
#28People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/6/20 at 10:45pm

I don't want to be polemic, but considering that both Titanic and Passion won the Tony for best musical, can we really consider them an infamy? especially since they are both widely revived, unlike Moose Murders. Titanic, in particular, went on for over 800 shows of Broadwat so even if surely did not recoup I wouldn't put it in the infamy category.

TotallyEffed Profile Photo
TotallyEffed
#29People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/6/20 at 11:26pm

I saw the actual performance of Spider-Man where that poor guy fell. It was truly terrifying and I’m being honest, I was certain in the moment that he had died. The screams and cries from backstage were blood curdling. I grabbed my friend’s hand and immediately started saying a prayer, that’s how shook I was and how helpless I felt. Thank goodness he survived.

The show was horrendous.

Joshua Rosenthal
#30People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 4:12am

jpbran said: "Only ones I've seen that will truly"live in infamy" would probably be Pirate Queen, King Kong, Lestat, Spider-Man and Cry-Baby. Cry-Baby and Pirate Queen were just lame bores, but the others were jaw-dropping in a"still glad I saw them even while cringing" kinda way."

I saw King Kong 4 times and I loved all of it! lol I saw ur early in previews (2nd and a week later), and post-opening, including the second to last performance

blaxx Profile Photo
blaxx
#31People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 4:28am

Like it always happens with threads like this, most shows mentioned here are not infamous, you just didn't like them much yourself.


Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE

Dollypop
#32People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 8:11am

imeldasturn said: "I don't want to be polemic, but considering that both Titanic and Passion won the Tony for best musical, can we really consider them an infamy? especially since they are both widely revived, unlike Moose Murders. Titanic, in particular, went on for over 800 shows of Broadwat so even if surely did not recoup I wouldn't put it in the infamy category."

 

I brought up one of the first previews of TITANIC because the preview period if that show was certainly infamous. Several preview performances were canceled because the ship wouldn't sink. The script was a mess, too. As I mentioned, substantial work was done on the show and what finally opened was virtually a different production from what played in early previews. 

The preview period for TITANIC was definitely infamous.

 


"Long live God!" (GODSPELL)

Dollypop
#33People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 8:11am



 


"Long live God!" (GODSPELL)
Updated On: 5/7/20 at 08:11 AM

trentsketch Profile Photo
trentsketch
#34People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 8:15am

I saw Spider-Man at multiple points in its rewrite process. I still think the Geek Chorus version was the best version. Julie Taymor's final pass before being let go was fine (not great, but decent popcorn entertainment), but the chum was in the water and everyone wanted a scapegoat for the never-ending previews and production problems. Remember, this is when critics broke the review embargo date because they were tired of the production pushing back opening night a few weeks to a month in advance. The version that actually opened was boring. The costumes and sets were cool and that Mary Jane song is lovely. Patrick Page was giving his all and the cast was being pushed to the limits for the sake of spectacle. 

My most vivid memory of the show was actually doing press at NYCC after the show finally opened. The show opened in June and NYCC is in October. They brought out the new book writer and a producer to promote the show at a big panel in one of the large auditoriums. They talked so much trash about Taymor and the audience was not responding at all to their "jokes." The legal action regarding how much of Taymor's material was used without credit was already in action and they were sitting their laughing it up about how much of the original vision they kept while tweaking the show and revising the second act. 

Meanwhile, there was a lovely series of performances from a far better superhero musical called Chix 6 that played at the stage in artist's alley. They managed not to air out any dirty laundry about their production during a Q&A. How novel. I think they renamed the show recently and are still trying to make a commercial run happen. 

Loopin’theloop
#35People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 8:37am

ggersten said: "CATSNYrevival said: "Stephen Ward was obviously a subject that was particularly interesting to Andrew Lloyd Webber but had limitedcommercial appeal to West End audiences, and virtually zero commercial appeal outside the UK.It's hard to build a hit show from that. Most people, particularly in America, likely don't know who Stephen Ward was and likelyjustdon't care either. Having said that, there are some lovely tunes. "This Side of the Sky" is a favorite."

Except, who would have thought a musical about Eva Peron would have any appeal to West End audiences or US audiences? Richard Eyre may not be Hal Prince - but he was no hack director. And Christopher Hampton is not a hack book writer. Stephen Ward could have worked - it just didn't.


"

Both Richard Eyre and Christopher Hampton excel with plays. Neither are good at musicals. The art form never fully gets the respect it deserves in the UK (and I am British) and because it hasn’t been taken as seriously as in the States (where it is arguably much more rooted in the culture) the UK don’t breed directors and writers who truly understand the craft, then a big musical comes around and they have nobody to turn to, so they go for a heavy weight play Director and writer who don’t quite understand the needs of a musical and the cycle continues. There are lots of young ‘none name’ creatives doing excellent work in England but the industry will never recognise that sort of talent in a long term commercial sense. You get the glimmers of someone who could really do the job well, people who are staging old fashioned musicals on the fringe who have the potential to really excel in their field but that work isn’t taken seriously - the skill it takes to pull off a musical comedy or big old fashioned book musical is not recognised and so those creatives never get that chance to climb up the industry ladder. England celebrates the ‘serious works’ and has no breeding ground for artful directors of musicals, who respect the form. 

tmdonahue
#36People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 9:33am

This is what experience has taught me.  Shows that get positive reviews may not be a positive experience for me.  But the converse is not true: shows with bad reviews are always bad.

Loopin’theloop
#37People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 10:57am

ggersten said: "CATSNYrevival said: "Stephen Ward was obviously a subject that was particularly interesting to Andrew Lloyd Webber but had limitedcommercial appeal to West End audiences, and virtually zero commercial appeal outside the UK.It's hard to build a hit show from that. Most people, particularly in America, likely don't know who Stephen Ward was and likelyjustdon't care either. Having said that, there are some lovely tunes. "This Side of the Sky" is a favorite."

Except, who would have thought a musical about Eva Peron would have any appeal to West End audiences or US audiences? Richard Eyre may not be Hal Prince - but he was no hack director. And Christopher Hampton is not a hack book writer. Stephen Ward could have worked - it just didn't.


"

Both Richard Eyre and Christopher Hampton excel with plays. Neither are good at musicals. The art form never fully gets the respect it deserves in the UK (and I am British) and because it hasn’t been taken as seriously as in the States (where it is arguably much more rooted in the culture) the UK don’t breed directors and writers who truly understand the craft, then a big musical comes around and they have nobody to turn to, so they go for a heavy weight play Director and writer who don’t quite understand the needs of a musical and the cycle continues. There are lots of young ‘none name’ creatives doing excellent work in England but the industry will never recognise that sort of talent in a long term commercial sense. You get the glimmers of someone who could really do the job well, people who are staging old fashioned musicals on the fringe who have the potential to really excel in their field but that work isn’t taken seriously - the skill it takes to pull off a musical comedy or big old fashioned book musical is not recognised and so those creatives never get that chance to climb up the industry ladder. England celebrates the ‘serious works’ and has no breeding ground for artful directors of musicals, who respect the form. 

Loopin’theloop
#38People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 10:57am

ggersten said: "CATSNYrevival said: "Stephen Ward was obviously a subject that was particularly interesting to Andrew Lloyd Webber but had limitedcommercial appeal to West End audiences, and virtually zero commercial appeal outside the UK.It's hard to build a hit show from that. Most people, particularly in America, likely don't know who Stephen Ward was and likelyjustdon't care either. Having said that, there are some lovely tunes. "This Side of the Sky" is a favorite."

Except, who would have thought a musical about Eva Peron would have any appeal to West End audiences or US audiences? Richard Eyre may not be Hal Prince - but he was no hack director. And Christopher Hampton is not a hack book writer. Stephen Ward could have worked - it just didn't.


"

Both Richard Eyre and Christopher Hampton excel with plays. Neither are good at musicals. The art form never fully gets the respect it deserves in the UK (and I am British) and because it hasn’t been taken as seriously as in the States (where it is arguably much more rooted in the culture) the UK don’t breed directors and writers who truly understand the craft, then a big musical comes around and they have nobody to turn to, so they go for a heavy weight play Director and writer who don’t quite understand the needs of a musical and the cycle continues. There are lots of young ‘none name’ creatives doing excellent work in England but the industry will never recognise that sort of talent in a long term commercial sense. You get the glimmers of someone who could really do the job well, people who are staging old fashioned musicals on the fringe who have the potential to really excel in their field but that work isn’t taken seriously - the skill it takes to pull off a musical comedy or big old fashioned book musical is not recognised and so those creatives never get that chance to climb up the industry ladder. England celebrates the ‘serious works’ and has no breeding ground for artful directors of musicals, who respect the form. 

hearthemsing22
#39People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 1:09pm

Huss417 said: "I would have to give this a lot more thought but three that I saw in person that come to mind. Carrie, Legs Diamond and Moose Murders. I know there must be more as I saw my first show in 1975."

NO WAY you saw Moose Murders??? oh my gosh. Do you remember it, how the experience was, the audiences reaction, do you still have your playbill--sorry, I'm such a dork and I'm not trying to be annoying I'm just so fascinated by that show! 

FindingNamo
#40People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 4:31pm

I somehow saw David Henry Huang's "Face Value" out of town.

And "Carrie."

There is nothing much to say about "Face Value" and nothing left to say about "Carrie."

 


Twitter @NamoInExile Instagram none

uncageg Profile Photo
uncageg
#41People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 5:03pm

I saw the musical "Platinum" with Alexis Smith and Lisa Mordente twice in Philadelphia before it went to Broadway, where it ran for about a month. 

I remember talk about it before seeing it and I think it was supposed to be a big deal for Alexis Smith. (She did get a Tony nomination) Seemed there ere problems with it and I seem to remember talk that it may not make it to Broadway. I also seem to remember the reviews in Philadelphia were not that great. It wasn't the greatest musical but I remember really liking the score and thinking some of it was different for a traditional musical. That may be why I enjoyed it. I was 17 at the time. I do remember reading about its closing on Broadway so soon and wondering if they recorded it.

I was obsessed with the song "Platinum Dreams" in the show. My school was offering free theater tickets so I grabbed one for a night the day after I saw it the first time. That second night Chita Rivera was there to see her daughter, Lisa Mordente. At intermission I was standing in the lobby and Chita came rushing through in a kaftan, didn't see me and knocked me and my soda to the floor. I didn't see her coming (I saw the kaftan!) but when she bent over to apologize and help me, I almost died when I realized who she was. (A few years back when I met her, I told her the story and she remembered it.)

Really wish the show had gotten a recording. I had a bootleg but it was not that great and I can't access it now.


Just give the world Love.
Updated On: 5/8/20 at 05:03 PM

Jarethan
#42People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 8:37pm

GavestonPS said: "I'm not sure how we are defining "infamy" here. It's a strong word.

I ended up howling with laughter at the first preview of MERRILY; it was such a mess! I saw the last preview and thought, "Well, it still doesn't work, but they have cleaned it up as much as they can."

I thought some of the more broadly farcical scenes in MOOSE MURDERS were really quite good. Unfortunately, the leading lady (Holland Taylor had replaced Eve Arden) had a dry delivery that completely clashed with broadness of the better scenes. (Both Taylor and Arden are/were brilliant comediennes, of course; the fault was in the show and direction, not in the acting.)

I was shocked to find A DOLL'S LIFE just as bad on the stage as it had been on the page before the company left for tryouts in California. To this day, I have no idea what Prince was thinking. I'm not sure he knew either, since I worked some of the auditions and he seemed entirely unsure what he wanted from the cast. But starting a musical comedy with the final scene from Ibsen's play was such a clash of styles, I was scratching my head along with the rest of the audience. Only I knew what to expect, so I wasn't laughing at tragedy.

On the other hand, I loved every minute of PASSION, though I know nobody else who agrees. I found its refusal to pander to "likability" entirely thrilling--and I fell in love with it all over again at a production in Pasadena in January, a run that was sadly cut short by the pandemic. It's akin to watching Grotowski--nobody cares whether you "like" the characters or the story; it isn't even an issue. One interesting change in Pasadena: they made no effort to make Fosca ugly with make-up. When she first entered, I thought "She's too pretty to play the part," but I quickly found her neurosis and neediness just as unappealing asDonna Murphy's unibrow. But in a curious way, it made Fosca more of an agent in her own story; she wasn't just a victim of nature.

Note to Jarethan: I too was uninspired by EVITA in previews. Then I saw it a few weeks later in London and loved it. The slightly broader musical-theater acting by English actors in those days made more sense of the material to me.
"

I was mainly referring to the point that there is not way that the original production of Evita, on either side of the pond, would live in infamy.  The person may not have liked it, but infamy...no.  I hated CATSthe very first time I saw it in London before it even came to NY...I would never say that it lives in infamy.  A lot of people don't like it, but it ran for almost 2 decades and won Tony's and Oliviers.  So, infamy makes no sense.

Re A Doll's Life, didn't that occur during Prince's (only?) dry period.  I seem to remember that he had three or four flops in a row...Merrily, A Doll's Life, and Grind.  I think A Doll's Life was right after Merrily.  Maybe he took it just to get back to work, and maybe his confidence was a little battered.  Lot's of conjecture, but would seem to make sense to me.

IronMan Profile Photo
IronMan
#43People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 9:15pm

I saw the only (?) two Broadway plays to close in previews: 

The final performance of "Face Value" (we didn't know it was the final), and before the show they announced that there would be no intermission (though there was in the program) and a few minutes in we realized why (so no one could leave).  What I recall is a messy plot, lame jokes, and Jane Krakowski's character only tapping, never just walking.  

The invited dress of "Bobbi Boland."  Yow.  I was with a handful of people, and we chose to sit a couple rows from the front- but turns out only about a hundred people were invited so we were actually the first row and could be seen by the cast.  The play was so trite and unnecessary that it wouldn't have worked in Florida dinner theater. High School Prom Queen and Quarterback now getting older... it's been done, and better.  Farrah Fawcett was ok if uninspired and looked like a Malibu Barbie that had been left out in the sun to slightly melt.  Knowing we could be seen meant pity laughs and plastered smiles for the way too long piece.  When I saw my friend who was working backstage after, I joked "Do you have another gig lined up for when this closes on Sunday?" and little did I know I was right.

The most infamous would have to be "The Blonde in the Thunderbird" but I'd need several cocktails to be able to survive reliving that experience.  Just imagine the 'Springtime for Hitler' audience's frozen-in-horror faces for 90 minutes. 


"What- and quit show business?" - the guy shoveling elephant shit at the circus.

viagalactica6
#44People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/7/20 at 10:11pm

I saw RACHEL LILLY ROSENBLOOM AND DON'T YOU EVER FORGET IT! I loved the show even though it stunk because all of my friends were in it and they got a chance to shine on Broadway.

Micki7
#45People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/8/20 at 12:44am

I also saw Rachael Lily Rosenbloom (And Don’t You Ever Forget It).
At least I can say that I never did forget it. The only thing I really remember about the show itself is that I had a very hard time following the plot. After the show ended I was unable to tell anyone what it was about. But I do feel sort of lucky to have seen it, although given a choice I’d have preferred seeing Carrie.

joevitus Profile Photo
joevitus
#46People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/8/20 at 2:17am

Dollypop said: "Lordy me, how did I forget BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY's with Mary Tyler Moore and Richard Chamberlain? Edward Albee's book was exceptionally talky and leaden and it's true, the audience did talk back to the actors. At one point Moore's character asked the rhetorical question, "What am I to do?" and a male voice from the audience answered, "Go home so we can, too!""

So I've always been baffled--since there was no cast album and other than a book on famous flops, no history of musical theater really covers it--what was such a train wreck about the show? Your comment about the book helps, but were the songs outrageously bad or just mediocre and forgettable? Was the direction and choreography hysterically wrong, or just uninteresting? Were the leads way out of their depth, or just stuck with bad material? This show is a famous ginormous bomb, but I never hear details. 

joevitus Profile Photo
joevitus
#47People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/8/20 at 2:24am

Anyone here go back far enough to have seen the Carol Channing vehicle The Vamp? Ethan Mordden's remark--that it's a shame there was no cast recording because it was one of the great weird shows, every choice a wrong one--has made me really curious about it.

goodlead
#48People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/8/20 at 2:20pm

Jarethan  -- Yes, "A Doll's Life" was part of Prince's dry period -- or perhaps parched period.  He has described it as ahead of its time, but no passage of time would make it better.

Dollypop
#49People Who Saw Shows That Now Live In Infamy, What Was Your Experience At Said Show?
Posted: 5/8/20 at 3:41pm

joevitus said: "Dollypop said: "Lordy me, how did I forget BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY's with Mary Tyler Moore and Richard Chamberlain? Edward Albee's book was exceptionally talky and leaden and it's true, the audience did talk back to the actors. At one point Moore's character asked the rhetorical question, "What am I to do?" and a male voice from the audience answered, "Go home so we can, too!""

So I've always been baffled--since there was no cast album and other than a book on famous flops, no history of musical theater really covers it--what was such a train wreck about the show? Your comment about the book helps, but were the songs outrageously bad or just mediocre and forgettable? Was the direction and choreography hysterically wrong, or just uninteresting? Were the leads way out of their depth, or just stuck with bad material? This show is a famous ginormous bomb, but I never hear details.
"

 

 

There is, indeed, a cast album. It's a studio recording starring Faith Prince and John Scjneider.

 


"Long live God!" (GODSPELL)


Videos